Patna High CourtCR. REV./1244/2017dismissed

Sk. Anwarul And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2023-09-25Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.1244 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2012 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Sk. Anwarul Son of Late SK. Babu Hussain, 2.

SK. Kamran Son of Late SK. Babu Hussain, 3.

Md. Majid, Son of SK. Anwarul, Nos. 1 to 3 resident of Village Shiorajpur, Polcie Station Nautan, District- West Champaran. 4.

SK. Munif Son of Late SK. Aziz, resident of Village Mahua Bhusa, Police Station- Gaunaha, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

State Of Bihar 2.

Tafrul Hayat Son of SK. Mozzamil, resident of Village Bhataura, Police Station Shikarpur, District- West Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Khatim Reza For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-09-2023

1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the State is present.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no. 2 submits that the present application has been preferred by the petitioners against the order, dated 16.10.2017, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge III, Bettiah, West Champaran in Sessions Trial No. 289 of 2017 (arising out of Shikarpur Police Station Case No. 218 of 2012 under Section 227 of the Criminal Procedure Code), which was dismissed.

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1244 of 2017(2) dt.25-09-2023 2/2

4. Learned counsel informs that during the pendency of this application, the stage of the case has changed and after framing of charges, all the prosecution witness have been examined and official witness i.e. Investigation Officer/Doctor are yet to be examined.

5. In view of the aforesaid submissions and taking into consideration the fact that the stage of the case, before the trial court, has now changed, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order.

6. This application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) ashwani/- U T