Gopalan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21889 of 2013 ====================================================== Gopalan Prasad S/o Late Ram Das Singh Resident of Village- Aganur, P.SKaler, District- Arwal. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate- Cum- Collector cum District Registrar, Arwal.

3. The Sub- Registrar, Sub Registry of Arwal.

4. Smt. Balkeshwari Devi W/o Late Kameshwar Singh Resident of VillageAganur, P.S- Kaler, District- Arwal. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar For the Respondent/s : AC to Addl. Advocate General - 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4.

17-08-2015 At the very outset, an objection was raised by learned A.C. to Addl. Advocate General - 3 that against the order impugned, the petitioner was having statutory remedy to approach the civil court instead of approaching this Court invoking its writ jurisdiction.

After objection being raised, Sri Bajrangi Lal, learned counsel, who was assisted by Sri Rakesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a prayer for disposal of the writ petition so that petitioner may avail appropriate remedy. The prayer is allowed.

The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty, as indicated above.

Patna High Court CWJC No.21889 of 2013 (4) dt.17-08-2015 2/2 It goes without saying that the period consumed by the petitioner in pursuing the present writ petition i.e. from 29-10-2013 till date shall be excluded while considering the limitation matter.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U