Soharam Nut v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28245 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2018 Thana- DAUDPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

SOHARAM NUT, Son of Chaturgun Nut, 2.

Suraj Nut @ Chandan Nut, Son of Late Chhathu Nut, both Resident of Village - Daudpur Giri Tola, P.S.- Daudpur, Distt - Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 01-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners seek bail in Daudpur P.S. Case No.229 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 25(1-B)A, 26 of the Arms Act.

Counsel for the petitioners submits that Petitioner is in custody since 23.11.2018.

As per written report, one loaded country made pistol and three live cartridges were recovered from possession of petitioner No.1. There is no recovery of firearm from possession of the petitioner.

Criminal antecedents of the petitioner No.1 has been mentioned in para 3 of the bail application. Counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28245 of 2019(2) dt.01-05-2019 2/2 petitioners submits that petitioner is on bail in all the cases as mentioned in para 3.

Keeping in view the period of custody, prayer of the petitioners for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran, in connection with Daudpur P.S. Case No.229 of 2018, subject to the condition that both the bailors shall be close relative of the petitioners.

Further, (i) the petitioners will remain present on each and every date of trial, (ii) Their absence on two consecutive date(s) without any reasonable cause will make their bail bond liable to be cancelled, and (iii) the petitioners will not intimidate the witnesses in any way and will not hamper the trial. (Sanjay Priya, J) J. Alam/- U T