Vinay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8101 of 2015 ====================================================== Vinay Kumar Singh son of Sri Ramadhin Prasad Singh Resident of village of village- Hijra, P.O. Barhauna, P.S. Barahat, District- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director Primary Education, Education Department , Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Teacher Appointment Appellate Authority, Banka, DistrictBanka, through the Presidin 5.

The District Magistrate , Banka, District- Banka. 6.

The District Education Officer, Banka , District - Banka, 7.

The District Program Officer Establishment, Banka, District- Banka. 8.

The Block Development Officer ,Barahat , District- Banka. 9.

The Block Education Officer, Barahat, District- Banka. null null 10.

The Mukhiya Grampanchayat Raj, Lorhiya Khurd, Block - Barahat, DitrictBanka. 11.

The Panchayat Secrtary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Lorhiya Khurd, BlockBarahat, District- Banka. 12.

Abhinav Kumar Singh son of Sri Dhananjay Prasad Singh Resident of village- Akhoiya Amarpur, P.O. and P.S. Amarpur, District- Banka. 13.

Rinku Kumari wife of Sanjay Prasad Resident of village- Baida Chak , P .O. Panjwara, P.S. Lakhpura, District- Banka.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chandan For the State :

Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha, GA 8 Ms. Seema Ghagala, AC to GA 8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 20-02-2023

1. The writ petition was filed in 2015. The order has become appealable after the constitution of the State

Patna High Court CWJC No.8101 of 2015 dt.20-02-2023 2/2 Appellate Authority.

2. Considering that there is a forum of appeal available, it would not be appropriate to hear the case on merits.

3. Granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority, where the case shall be heard on merits without delving on the question of limitation, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Sachin/- Item No. 29 AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date