Sanchit Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2338 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 2018 Thana -ROHTAS District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ===========================================================

1. Sanchit Singh, Son of Sudarshan Singh @ Darshan Singh,

2. Vivek Singh, Son of Ramdeo Singh,

3. Kunal Singh, Son of Rameshwar Singh,

4. Karan Singh @ Bigan Singh, Son of Satyendra Singh,

5. Raju Singh @ Raju Kumar Singh, Son of Late Ajit Singh,

6. Pamu Singh @ Prabhu Singh, Son of Saryu Singh, All are resident of VillageSamahuta, Police Station- Rohtas, District- Rohtas. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail vide order dated 18.06.2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Rohtas at Sasaram, in Registered Case No.61 of 2018, arising out of Rohtas Police Station Case No.55 of 2018, registered under Sections 341/323/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(r) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2338 of 2018 dt.10-08-2018 P2/ The offences alleged under the Indian Penal Code are bailable. The appellants have stated on oath that they have got no criminal antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the appellants, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the appellants shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellants. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date15.08.2018 Transmission Date 15.08.2018