Ashraf Mian @ Md. Asraf v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2201 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2021 Thana- ISUAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

ASHRAF MIAN @ MD. ASRAF SON OF JABBAR MIAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MURWAN KHASH, PS- ISUAPUR, DISTT- SARAN AT CHHAPRA 2.

AMZAD ALI @ BHUWAR MIAN SON OF JABBAR MIAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MURWAN KHASH, PS- ISUAPUR, DISTT- SARAN AT CHHAPRA 3.

JALALUDDIN @ JALALUDDIN MIAN SON OF KUDRAT MIAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MURWAN KHASH, PS- ISUAPUR, DISTTSARAN AT CHHAPRA 4.

IGRAIL MIAN @ IZRAIL MIAN SON OF KUDRAT MIAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MURWAN KHASH, PS- ISUAPUR, DISTT- SARAN AT CHHAPRA 5.

ESRAIL MIAN @ ISRAIL MIAN SON OF JALALUDDIN MIAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MURWAN KHASH, PS- ISUAPUR, DISTTSARAN AT CHHAPRA 6.

MOHAMMAD NAIM @ NAEM MIAN SON OF KARMULLAH MIAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MURWAN KHASH, PS- ISUAPUR, DISTTSARAN AT CHHAPRA 7.

MD CHOTAN @ CHHOTAN MIAN SON OF LATE NASRUDDIN MIAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MURWAN KHASH, PS- ISUAPUR, DISTTSARAN AT CHHAPRA ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

RAMISHWAR RAM SON OF LATE JAMUNA RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MURWAN KHASH, PS- ISUAPUR, DISTT- SARAN AT CHHAPRA ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-08-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and the State.

2. It is submitted by the State that the prayer for pre-

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2201 of 2023(2) dt.16-08-2023 2/2 arrest bail of the appellant is not maintainable as cognizance has already been taken by the court below also for the offences punishable under the SC/ST Act. In this regard, reliance is placed in the case of Bachu Das Vs. State of Bihar and others, reported in (2014) 3 Supreme Court Cases 471.

3. In view of the aforesaid pronouncement of law rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court, appellants' prayer of pre-arrest is refused.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Kaushik/- U T