← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29495/2025bail granted

Rajiv Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-06Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29495 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2025 Thana- PARSABAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== RAJIV KUMAR S/o Rajan Ray@Ranjan Ray Resident of village - Kamarji, P.S. - Gaurichak, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Parsa Bazar P.S. Case No. 64/2025 dated 10.02.2025 registered for the offence punishable u/s 309(6) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, three unknown miscreants ridden on the motorcycle are alleged to have snatched Rs. 2,000/- from the pocket of the informant. Further, the miscreants assaulted the informant with the butt of the pistol, causing head injury. Thereafter, nearby people assembled there then the miscreants fled away leaving the motorcycle.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29495 of 2025(2) dt.06-05-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused, Abhishek Kumar. As per para. 147 of the case diary, the injury is simple in nature. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 11.02.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Patna in connection with Parsa Bazar P.S. Case No. 64/2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T