Mahmood Ansari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19130 of 2013 ===========================================================

1. Mahmood Ansari Son Of Late Madar Baksh Ansari Resident Of Village- Sarsain Balua, P.O.- Saghar, Sultanpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Siwan. At PresentThe Secretary Of Managing Committee Of Madarsa Islamia, At Village- Sarsain Balua, P.O.- Saghar, Sultanpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Siwan .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar, Through The Secretary, Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Patna

2. The Director Of Bihar Madarsa Board, Patna

3. The Regional Deputy Director Education, Tirhut Division, District- Muzaffarpur

4. The District Education Officer, Siwan, District- Siwan

5. The District Program Officer (Establishment), Siwan

6. The District Magistrate, Siwan, District-Siwan

7. The Circle Officer, (C.O.), Bhagwanpur Hat, District- Siwan

8. The Block Education Officer, Bhagwanpur Siwan, District- Siwan

9. The Bihar Madarsa Education Board, Patna, Through Director .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. ARBIND KUMAR For the State:

Mr. Madhubala Verma For the Madarsa Board:

Md. Rashid Alam =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-08-2015 *************** 25.08.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The dispute raised by the petitioner does not come within the ambit of Article 226 of the Constitution of India. He may file a suit for appropriate declaration where appropriate evidence, both oral and documentary, may be taken tested and then adjudicated.

In the alternative the petitioner may initiate a fresh exercise, if he so wants by moving the authorities. Writ application is otherwise dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) U SKM/-