Chunnu Prasad @Chunnu Patel@Chunnu Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30793 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-342 Year-2018 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
CHUNNU PRASAD @CHUNNU PATEL@Chunnu Ray Son of Washna Ray, Resident of Haidal Colony, P.S.- Valmiki Nagar, Distt - West Champaran.
2.
Nandlal Patel Son of Hareram Patel, Resident of Upari Shivir near Guest house, P.S.- Valmiki Nagar, Distt - West Champaran. 3.
Ashish Anand Son of Gagendra Prasad, Resident of Upari Shivir near Guest house, P.S.- Valmiki Nagar, Distt - West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No. 342 of 2018 registered for offence punishable under sections 379 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
In the FIR, it has been alleged that the petitioners came at the residence of informant and told to invest the money in their company named as M.L.M. and on their persuasion, the informant invested the money and he was inducted as 50% share holder in the said company, later on, the company was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30793 of 2019(3) dt.10-05-2019 2/3 not functioning, the informant wanted to withdraw his share from the company and after proper accountancy, as per the accounts, the company holds Rs. 2,95,300/-. So far petitioners role is concerned, they have only persuaded the informant to invest the money in their company and on their persuasion, the money was invested by him. It appears that it was a dispute of accountancy and vis-a-vis matter relates to entitlement of payment of Rs.2,95,300/- and role of these petitioners is that they have only persuaded the informant to invest the money.
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is allowed and they, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 10th SubJudge-cum-Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Patrakar Nagar P.S. Case No. 342 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30793 of 2019(3) dt.10-05-2019 3/3 evidence. The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T