Ajit Jha @ Ajit Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30417 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2023 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== 1.

Ajit Jha @ Ajit Kumar Jha S/O Suryakant Jha Resident Of Village- Ulaw, Ward No. 3, P.S. Mifassil (Singhaul), District- Begusarai 2.

Pranav Jha S/O Ajit Jha @ Ajit Kumar Jha Resident Of Village- Ulaw, Ward No. 3, P.S. Mifassil (Singhaul), District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Niraj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Bhushan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners along with other accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant and his family members.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submit that this is counter

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30417 of 2023(2) dt.14-07-2023 2/2 case to the Complaint Case No. 362(c)/2023 filed by the petitioners' side against the informant. He further submits that the petitioners and their entire family have been made accused in this case with view to pressurize them to leaver their legal and valid claim over the road in question. He also submits that the injury was found simple in nature. Petitioners have one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the injury, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Muffasil (Singhaul) P.S. Case No.120 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T