← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28958/2020bail granted

Binod Kewat @ Vinod Kewat v. The State Of Bihar

2020-11-09Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28958 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2020 Thana- CHEWARA District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Binod Kewat @ Vinod Kewat, S/o Late Ramjeet Kewat, Resident of Beldaria Tola, P.S.-Chewara, District-Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dinkar Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mustaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 09-11-2020 Since as of now the Courts have not resumed normal physical hearing, the matter has been listed today for consideration through video conferencing.

The learned counsels are appearing and making submissions from their residence.The Court Master and Secretary are also part of this virtual Court proceedings from their homes, all with the aid of audio visual technology.

Mr. Mustaque Alam, learned APP is appearing for the State as it is submitted that the brief has been allotted to him by the office of Advocate General.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28958 of 2020(2) dt.09-11-2020 2/3 Excise Case No.82 of 2020 arising out of Chewara P.S. Case No.19 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the I.P.C. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

The petitioner is in custody since 06.07.2020 on the alleged recovery of 24 litres country-made liquor kept in two plastic jerrycan from near the river.

It is submitted that the petitioner's implication is merely on the basis of disclosure by village Choukidar. He has not been arrested from the spot. At the time of recovery, there is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. and the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the rival submissions, this Court is inclined to allow the petitioner's prayer for bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Sheikhpura, in connection with Excise Case No.82 of 2020 arising out of Chewara P.S. Case No.19 of 2020,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28958 of 2020(2) dt.09-11-2020 3/3 subject to the following conditions:

(i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled.

This Court would expect that the petitioner's counsel would honour his undertaking in the instant proceedings regarding supply of the requisite court fee etc. within two weeks from the date he is called upon to do so by the office. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) PNM U T