Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45382 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-13 Year-2020 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Ranjan Kumar S/O DEVENDRA YADAV VILLAGE- NAREPUR DIYARA, P.S.- BACHHWARA, DISTRICT BEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rahul Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-07-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The defect, as pointed out by the office, is hereby ignored.
3. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case during the course of investigation. It is next submitted that earlier Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 06 of 2020 was instituted against the informant and his side under various sections of the IPC including 307 of the IPC read with Section 27 of the Arms Act with an allegation that the informant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45382 of 2024(2) dt.30-07-2024 2/3 and his associates had shot the brother of the petitioner. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that petitioner is not even named in the FIR and specific allegation of assaulting the informant is against Niraj Kumar @ Chhotu, but then at the stage of supervision, the name of the petitioner also transpired. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will co-operate in the investigation.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 13 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. However, it is made clear that in the event if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45382 of 2024(2) dt.30-07-2024 3/3 learned Trial Court bringing to its notice that petitioner despite giving assurance to this Court is not co-operating in the investigation or not presenting himself as and when required, in that event the learned Trial Court shall be at liberty to forthwith cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T