Masih Alam @ Massi Alam @ Masih v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28875 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2024 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria ====================================================== Masih Alam @ Massi Alam @ Masih Son of Late Mushtaque @ Late Mohammad Mushtaque Resident of village - Ward No.- 6, Matiyari, P.S.- Jokihat, District - Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyameshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-05-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 21(A) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant bail application has been filed in terms of the liberty granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge by an order dated 05.03.2025 in Cr. Misc. No.11130/2025. It is submitted that charges against the petitioner stands framed by an order dated 05.04.2025 (Annexure-3 to the regular bail application).It is next submitted that the case was taken up on 02.05.2025, when bail was granted to the petitioner with a condition that one of the bailor of the petitioner shall be his cousin brother Manajir Alam, who is deponent in the instant bail application but then it was submitted on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28875 of 2025(3) dt.09-05-2025 2/2 that Manajir Alam may not be in a position to furnish the security required for furnishing the bail bond. It is next submitted that as such a supplementary affidavit has been filed wherein at para-4 it has been pleaded that own brother of the petitioner Md. Masum Anwer is willing to furnish security for release of the petitioner on bail.

4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No. 139/2024.

5. Further, one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his brother Md. Masum Anwer.

6. It is made clear that if the learned trial court comes to a conclusion that if the petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T