Guddu Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39976 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -200 Year- 2017 Thana -HAJIPUR SADAR DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Guddu Kumar, Son of Angat Rai,

2. Ranjeet Rai, Son of Basuli Rai,

3. Rupesh Kumar, Son of Late Bhagwan Rai,

4. Lokesh Kumar, Son of Late Bhagwan Rai, All resident of Village- Dighi Kala, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-07-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Hazipur Sadar P.S.Case no.200 of 2017 dated 12.5.2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 342, 323, 337, 338, 307, 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and as per FIR a large number of accused persons have assaulted to two deceased persons by bricks and stones as a result of which they died. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that except confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioners.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39976 of 2018 (3) dt.27-07-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above , let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 8th Additional Session Judge, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hazipur Sadar P.S.Case No.200 of 2017 dated 12.5.2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T