Soni Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55917 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -9 Year- 2017 Thana -PIPRA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Soni Devi, wife of Dasai Sah,

2. Urmila Devi, daughter of Rajendra Sah,

3. Gouti Devi, wife of Rajendra Sah,

4. Rajendra Sah, son of late Vijadhar Sah,

5. Dasai Sah,

6. Sohan Kumar, both sons of Rajendra Sah, all residents of villageJahingara, P.S.- Pipra, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Asharaf Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 22-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Pipra P.S. Case No.09 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304B/34 Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that these petitioners are family members of husband of the deceased. Husband of the deceased is already in custody.

In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55917 of 2017 (2) dt.22-11-2017 2/2 the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No.09 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.

with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T