Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29085/2026dismissed

Subhash Mahto @ Subhash Kumar @ Subash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-08Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29085 of 2026 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19538 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2026 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran ====================================================== Subhash Mahto @ Subhash Kumar @ Subash Kumar S/O Shivnath Mahato @ Shivnath Mahto Resident of Village- Purbi Dahiyawan, Police StationChapra Town, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Adarsh Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The present application has been filed seeking modification of the order dated 31.03.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 19538 of 2026 arising out of Nagar P.S. Case No. 45 of 2026, whereby the petitioner was enlarged on regular bail subject to the condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and the bail bonds shall be accepted only upon confirmation that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inadvertence, it was stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29085 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 2/2 application that the petitioner had no criminal antecedent, whereas, in fact, the petitioner is also an accused in two other criminal cases, namely, (i) Saran Mufassil P.S. Case No. 349 of 2018, and (ii) Saran Town P.S. Case No. 648 of 2023.

4. The present application seeking modification of the said order on the ground that the petitioner is, in fact, involved in other criminal cases, amounts to seeking review of the earlier order, which is not maintainable in the eye of law.

5. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present modification application.

6. Accordingly, the present application stands dismissed as not maintainable, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh bail application, if so advised. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T