Dr.Birendra Prasad Gupta v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7464 of 2012 ====================================================== DR.BIRENDRA PRASAD GUPTA, Son Of Sri Bhushan Prasad Gupta Resident Of Salapatganj, Gudri Bazar, Chapra, District - Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
THE UNION OF INDIA (through Secretary Defence, Sena Bhawan, New Delhi) 2.
Station Commander, Job Sub Area, Danapur Cantt., Danapur 3.
Managing Director, Ex-Service Man, Contributory Health Scheme, C/O Regional Centre E.C.H.S. 132/2, Robert Lane, Near Manas Mandir, Jabalpur 4.
Central Organization, Adjutant General'S Brach, Army Head Quarter, Maude Line, Delhi Cantt-110010 Ah Of Mod Army, Moudle Lane, Delhi 5.
Officer In Charge, Ex-Service Man, Contributory Health Scheme, C/O Regional Centre E.C.H.S. 132/2, Robert Lane, Near Manas Mandir, Jabalpur 6.
Officer-In-Charge, E.C.H.S. Poly Clinic, House Of Dr, Sridhar Mukund, First Floor,Main Road, Gudri Bazar, Chapra at Saran (Ex-Service Man Contributory Health Service).
7.
Director , Regional Centre, E.C.H.S. Patna , HQ, J And B Sub Area Danapur Cantt ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. K. N. Singh, ASG Mr. Amish Kumar, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-07-2024 Mr. K. N. Singh, learned ASG along with Mr. Amish Kumar, learned CGC, informs this Court that they have received specific instruction that the petitioner is presently serving as Dental Officer at ECHS, Gaya, under station HQ ECHS Cell, (Gaya), by referring informations contained in a letter dated 19.06.2024 of ECHS Polyclinic, Chapra (Bihar).
2. I have perused the informations contained in letter
Patna High Court CWJC No.7464 of 2012(4) dt.01-07-2024 2/2 dated 19.06.2024. I find the writ petition to be misconceived and deserves to be dismissed. The authority concerned may take appropriate action against the petitioner.
3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U