Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28556/2025bail granted

Vikash Baitha @ Vikash Kumar @ Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-14Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28556 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2015 Thana- ADAPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Vikash Baitha @ Vikash Kumar @ Arvind Kumar son of Shambhu Baitha Resident of village- Teenkoni, Ps- Darps, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Adapur P.S. Case No. 205 of 2015 dated 25.11.2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20, 22, 23 and 24 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 80 gram brown sugar was recovered from the co-accused, Ramjee.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case during the course of investigation. The seized contraband is less

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28556 of 2025(3) dt.14-05-2025 2/2 than commercial quantity. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 02.01.2025. The co-accused, Ramjee has been granted regular bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.03.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4330 of 2016.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Adapur P.S. Case No. 205 of 2015.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) shivam/- U T