Patna High CourtCWJC/9218/2015withdrawn

Rajkumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-03-30Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9218 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Rajkumar Thakur son of Pashuram Thakur resident of village - Chakadadan, P.S.- Mahua, Panchayat- Rasulpur Mobarak, DistrictVaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary , (Secondary Education), Education Department , Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director (Secondary Education ), Education Department , Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The State Project Director , Bihar Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, 8th Floor, Bihar, School Examination Board (Senior Section) Building , Budha Marg, Patna.

5. The District Magistrate , Vaishali at Hajipur.

6. The District Education Officer , Vaishali at Hajipur.

7. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Vaishali at Hajipur

8. The Block f Development Officer, Mahua, Vaishali.

9. The Circle Officer , Mahua District - Vaishali.

10. Head Master , Upgradded Secondary High School , Harpur, Gangaram , Rasulpur Mobarak , Mahua, District- Vaishali. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K. Verma, AAG-5 Mr. Saroj Kumar Sharma, AC to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 30-03-2016 Heard Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. P.K. Verma, learned Additional Advocate General No.5, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with

Patna High Court CWJC No.9218 of 2015 (2) dt.30-03-2016 2/2 appropriate application in future.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) Mkr./- U