Ravi Shankar Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.38532 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -33 Year- 2017 Thana -PIRO District- BHOJPUR ======================================================
1. Ravi Shankar Rai S/o Kedar Rai, R/o Vill.- Jamuaon , P.S.- Piro, DistrictBhojpur, Ara. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Piro P.S.Case No. 33 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 Arms Act.
The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. The allegation of firing is against one another co-accused, Dhananjay Rai, whose marriage was fixed, for which he wants booking of Band Baza for that date but on that date, the informant's "bandbaza" was already booked.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that except that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R., there is no any specific allegation against the petitioner.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38532 of 2018 (2) dt.03-07-2018 2/2 Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Piro P.S.Case No. 33 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate -I, Bhojpur , Ara, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 ( 2) Cr.P.C. with other that bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned and petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and shall be present before police as and when required, otherwise prosecution is at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T