Patna High CourtCWJC/8981/2015disposed

Yogendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-19Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8981 of 2015 ====================================================== Yogendra Ram Son of Pancha Raut, Resident of Village - Chandpur, P.O. - Sikandarpur, P.S. - Sangrampur, District - East Champaran (Motihari). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Directorate of Animal Husbandry Department, Patna.

3. The Regional Director, Department of Animal Husbandry, Magadh Range, Gaya.

4. The District Animal Husbandry Officer, Nawada.

5. The Treasury Officer, Motihari.

6. The Accountant General (A&E) II, Bihar, Beerchand Patel Path, Patna.

7. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Motihari (East Champaran). .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saroj Kumar, Advocate For the Accountant General : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Adv. For the State : Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta, AC to GP.10 For the SBI : Mr. Kaushlendra Kumar Sinha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State, learned counsel for the Accountant General and learned counsel for the State Bank of India. Pursuant to the order dated 16.05.2017, the Branch Manager of the State Bank of India, Motihari, East Champaran

Patna High Court CWJC No.8981 of 2015 (6) dt.19-05-2017 2/2 is present.

On query, the Branch Manager submitted that the commuted value of pension amounting to Rs.323499.00/- has already been credited to the account of the petitioner on 18.05.2017.

In support of his submission, he has also produced an authenticated copy of the statements of account of the petitioner. Let the same be kept on record.

Since the grievances of the petitioner raised in the application stand redressed, the writ application is disposed of. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Kanchan/- U