← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39895/2024dismissed

Nawlesh Yadav @ Nawlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-31Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39895 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-358 Year-2020 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== Nawlesh Yadav @ Nawlesh Kumar Son of Lato Yadav Resident of Village and P.S.- Giriyak, District- Nalanda, At present R/o Village- Bhadaur, near Sita Ram Sahu College, P.S.- Nagar, Dist.- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 31-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 302, 201/34 of the IPC. 3.

As per the prosecution case, the daughter of the informant is said to have been killed by the petitioner and other co-accused persons on the pretext of non-fulfillment of demand for dowry. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to enmity. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. There is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence. Petitioner has been made accused only on the basis of suspicion.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39895 of 2024(2) dt.31-07-2024 2/2 The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been rotting in judicial custody since 05.01.2024.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. 6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

8.

However, petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charges.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T