← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19410/2014disposed

Kunti Devi v. Birendra Kumar Sharma And ORS

2024-10-03Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19410 of 2014 ====================================================== Kunti Devi Wife of Hari Sharma, D/o Late Bindeshwari Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Mahajpura, P.S. Bikramganj, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Birendra Kumar Sharma Son of Late Jhalakdeo Singh 2.

Rita Devi W/o Birendra Kumar Sharma Both resident of Village Veerpur, P.S. Naubatpur, District Patna. 3.

Jeetwahan Singh Son of Late Chamru Singh Resident of Village Veerpur, P.O. Nagma, P.S.Naubatpur, District Patna.

4.

Asha Devi w/o Anil Sharma, D/o Bindeshwari Prasad Singh Resident of Village Ariaun, P.S. Paliganj, District Patna. 5.

Rajeev Ranjan Son of Sri Tej Bahadur Singh Resident of Village Ariawan, P.S. Bikramganj, District Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kishore Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-10-2024 Though the present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 09.07.2014, passed by the District Judge, Patna in Civil Misc. (Transfer) Case No.142 of 2014 whereby and whereunder the learned Court below has been pleased to transfer the pending Title Partition Suit No.336 of 2010 to the learned Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, Danapur as also has directed that the same be heard along with Title Suit No.24 of 2012, however, the learned Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge-II, Civil Court, Danapur, vide letter dated 06.08.2018, has informed this Court

Patna High Court CWJC No.19410 of 2014(4) dt.03-10-2024 2/2 that the Plaintiff has led his evidence and the Plaintiff's evidence has been closed on 08.01.2018, whereafter the defendant is adducing evidence.

2. In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the aforesaid cases before the learned trial court, itself. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U