Sumit Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.54563 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2017 Thana- MITHANPURA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sumit Kumar, S/o Late Narendra Kumar Lal, R/o Mohalla- Shashtri Nagar, Paras Singh Lane, P.S.- Mithanpura, District- Muzaffarpur (Presently posted as Customer Care Manager, I.C.I.C.I. Bank, Coporate Finance & Foreign Exchange Department, Videocon Tower, Jhandewala, New Delhi ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Rakhi Kumari, w/o Mr. Sumit Kumar, D/o Shri Suman Krishnalal Das. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Awadhesh Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP For opposite party No.2 :
Mrs. Kumari Archana @ Archana Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54563 of 2017(2) dt.23-11-2017 2/2 petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State and learned counsel for the opposite party No.2, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, East, Muzaffarpur in connection with Mithanpura P.S. cae No.121 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T