Arjun Kumar @ Arjun Kumar Roy @ Arjun Kumr v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30345 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-22 Year-2019 Thana- AWTARNAGAR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
ARJUN KUMAR @ ARJUN KUMAR RAI @ ARJUN KUMR Son of Shankar Rai Resident of Village - Haraji, P.S.- Awtarnagar, Dist.- Saran. 2.
Sikandar Rai @ Sikandar Kumar Rai Son of Late Ram Pravesh Rai Resident of Village - Haraji, P.S.- Awtarnagar, Dist.- Saran. 3.
Krishna Rai Son of Rajendra Rai Resident of Village - Haraji, P.S.- Awtarnagar, Dist.- Saran.
4.
Jitendra Kumar Son of Anandi Rai Resident of Village - Haraji, P.S.- Awtarnagar, Dist.- Saran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shashi Bhushan Kumar For the State :
Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin For the Informant : Mr. Devendra Narayan Singh, ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 02-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Awtarnagar PS Case No. 22/2019.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. The accusation of assault is general and omnibus in nature and the injuries are simple in nature. Snatching of jewelry from the aunt and mother of the informant are mere embellishment. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30345 of 2019(2) dt.02-08-2019 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-X, Saran, in connection with Awtarnagar PS Case No. 22/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:
i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T