← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40307/2018bail granted

Ramu Chaudhary @ Kaliya And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-07-13Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40307 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2018 Thana- JAKKANPUR District- Patna ======================================================

1. Ramu Chaudhary @ Kaliya, S/o Late Kameshwar Chaudhary,

2. Munna Chaudhary @ Munna Kumar, S/o Late Kameshwar Chaudhary, both are Resident of Village- New Purandarpur Bapupath Gali Do Pulwa, P.S.- Jakkanpur, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Gauri Shankar Gupta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 38(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 126 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The names of the petitioners have transpired as the alleged recovery is made from the joint house of the petitioners where the other family members also reside. Except for this,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40307 of 2018(2) dt.13-07-2018 2/2 there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in this case. It is alleged that 126 liters wine is recovered from the joint house of the petitioners. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R./complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Patna in connection with Special Case No. 2009/2018 arising out of Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 102 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T