Md. Salman @ Md. Salaman v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28934 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2025 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Salman @ Md. Salaman Son of Md. chand Resident Of VillageHarinagar, Ps- Rajnagar, Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gopal Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 8 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 103(1), 80, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner alongwith the family members tortured and killed the deceased for the non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28934 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 2/3 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is the husband of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that as per post-mortem report, there is no external injury on the body of the deceased and it has also been observed that the final opinion regarding the cause of death can be given after FSL report. Learned counsel further submitted that, police after investigation submitted charge-sheet under Sections 108, 80, 85 of the BNS. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 11.01.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, submission of charge-sheet under Sections 108, 80, 85 of the BNS as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28934 of 2025(3) dt.06-08-2025 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 8 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T