← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40494/2018dismissed

Hare Ram Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2018-07-12Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40494 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -269 Year- 2017 Thana -PARWATTA District- KHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Hare Ram Mandal, son of Kailash Mandal @ Kailash, resident of Village- Kurwan, Police Station- Beldaur, District- Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Syed Masleh-Uddin Ashraf, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 269 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner got himself appointed as block teacher in the name of Balu Bhai but later on it was detected.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the real fact is that the nick name of the petitioner is Bulu Bhai and under such impression he joined the post but after

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40494 of 2018 (2) dt.12-07-2018 2/2 that the petitioner had refunded the entire amount and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent..

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

n In view of allegation against the petitioner, above named, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to the petitioner that if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below and makes prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of this Court.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T