Golu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28996 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-630 Year-2019 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== GOLU KUMAR Son of Vindeshwar Sah @ Bindeshwar Sah @ Vindeshwar Sahni Resident of Mohalla- Zero Mile, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raja Ram Rai, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 15-12-2020 As of now the Courts have not resumed normal physical hearing, the matter has been listed today for consideration through Video Conferencing.

The learned counsels are appearing and making submissions from their residence. The Court Master and Secretary are also part of this virtual court proceedings from their homes, all with the aid of audio visual technology.

Ms. Pushpa Sinha No. 1, APP is appearing for the State as it is submitted that the brief has been allotted to him by the office of Advocate General.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Counsel for the State.

. This Court would expect that the petitioner's Counsel would honour his undertaking in the instant proceedings regarding supply of requisite court fee etc. within two weeks from the date he is called upon to do so by the office.

Petitioner seeks bail in Muzaffarpur Sadar PS Case No. 630 of 2019 registered under Section 393 of the IPC. The informant has alleged that while he was returning

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28996 of 2020(4) dt.15-12-2020 2/2 home, four persons have surrounded him and tried to snatch his motorcycle key. They have been apprehended by the local persons and handed over to the police.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he is in custody since 11.9.2019 and that it is a case of false implication as he was not directly arrested by the Police.

Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail. It is submitted that there is specific allegation against the petitioner and he has been apprehended on the spot trying to commit the crime. Considering the rival submissions, for the present, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected with liberty, however, to approach this Court for bail after framing of charges. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U T