Ankit Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Chotu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30366 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2021 Thana- SINGHESHWAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== Ankit Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Chotu Son of Arun Kumar Jaiswal @ Arun Choudhary @ Arun Jaiswal R/O-Raghopur, P.S.-Raghopur, Distt.-Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arvind Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise Case No. 427 of 2021, arising out of Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 149 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Section 120(B) of the IPC and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
As per allegation, from a truck, total 4466.495 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor were recovered. The name of the petitioner sprang up on the confession of apprehended co-accused person.
2/4 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He also submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot and maliciously, on the basis of confessional statement of apprehended co-accused person, the petitioner has been roped in the present case.
He further submits that the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 31.03.2023.
It has also been stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition that apart from the present case, the petitioner is also made accused in 2 other cases.
It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier for regular bail.
However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioner for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this application is allowed, directing the petitioner, above-
3/4 named, to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of ₹ the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Session Judge-V-cum-Special Judge, Excise ActI, Madhepura, in connection with Excise Case No. 427 of 2021, arising out of Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 149 of 2021, on the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner will make himself available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required. (ii) The petitioner will undertake that investigation/trial will not get hampered on account of his absence or non-cooperation. He must be available to the police or the court whenever his presence is required. (iii) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.
(iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioner has concealed his criminal
4/4 antecedents, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the same.
(v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
(vi) In case, the petitioner repeats offence of similar nature after enlargement on bail, his bail-bond will be cancelled by the court below.
Ld. counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects, if any, pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections.
(Jitendra Kumar, J) Amrendra/- U T