Rajeev Kumar @ Raju v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30365 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-488 Year-2022 Thana- JAKKANPUR District- Patna ====================================================== RAJEEV KUMAR @ RAJU SON OF BASUDEO RAY R/O-GAYATRI SADAN BATUKESHWAR DUTT LANE ROAD, JAKKANPUR, P.S.- JAKKANPUR, DISTT.-PATNA, BIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Kaushlendra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-07-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 379, 506 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The informant alleges that on account of previous dispute, the accused persons including the petitioner came variously armed and started assaulting her brother and when she went to save him, it is alleged that petitioner assaulted her with an iron rod causing injury on her head and she fell down, it is further alleged that Manoj Rai snatched gold chain from the neck of the informant while other accused assaulted her with legs and fists due to which she sustained injury on her head and petitioner threatened her with pistol.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30365 of 2023(2) dt.26-07-2023 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of three cases and has been falsely implicated in the present case because of his antecedents, it is next submitted that petitioner was not even present at the place of occurrence, further even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the injury suffered by the informant is simple in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jakkanpur P.S. Case No. 488 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T