← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9089/2015dismissed

Seema Ranjana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2022-12-12Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9089 of 2015 ====================================================== Seema Ranjana Kumari, daughter of Late Shiv Shankar Singh, wife of Shri Rameshwar Singh, resident of Village +P.O.- Itawa, P.S.- Pachrukhi, DistrictSiwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.

The District Education Officer, Siwan.

4.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Siwan. 5.

The Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Veterinary, Patna- 800014.

6.

The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Veterinary, Patna-800014.

7.

The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Veterinary, Patna-800014.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For Respondent No.5 to 7:

Mr.Gyan Shankar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 12-12-2022 The petitioner's counsel was granted time for informing the Court whether the petitioner has represented before the Committee constituted pursuant to the Court's order passed in CWJC No.17899 of 2012, whereby a Committee under the Chairmanship of Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar was constituted to look into any anomaly that may have occurred in filling up vacancy of Teachers pursuant to the selection process under

Patna High Court CWJC No.9089 of 2015(3) dt.12-12-2022 2/2 Advertisement No.210/2010.

Such query was made since the petitioner has claimed by way of instant writ proceedings that a direction be issued for her appointment as an Assistant Teacher (Trained) in Elementary School after including her name in the select list. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had not represented before the Committee constituted for removing the anomaly.

Since the petitioner has not represented before the Committee so constituted and failed to avail the opportunity, this Court does not find the petitioner's claim for direction to appoint the petitioner to be sustainable.

Writ petition is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) PNM U