Subham Kumar @ Subham Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40906 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -212 Year- 2017 Thana -DELHA District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Subham Kumar @ Subham Raj, Son of Shankar Yadav @ Shambhu Yadav, resident of Mohalla- Kharkhura Bhatt Bigha, P.S.- Delha, DistrictGaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2018 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Delha Police Station Case No. 212 of 2017, disclosing offences under Sections 341, 323, 379, 308, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and others is of assault to the informant and his two sons.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that only general and omnibus allegation against petitioner and fifteen others has been leveled and though there is allegation of assault, injuries caused to the informant and others were found to be simple in nature.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40906 of 2018 (2) dt.16-07-2018 2/2 let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate -VII, Gaya, in connection with Delha Police Station Case No. 212 of 2017, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

I.

One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

II.

The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event on failure of his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T