← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8792/2019disposed

Rajni Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-01Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 8792 of 2019 ====================================================== Rajni Kumari, aged about 25 years, Female, Wife of Balmiki Rao Ambedkar, Resident of Village- Kamargama, P.O. Kishanpur P.S. Bathnaha, DistrictSitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

3.

The District Program Officer (Establishment), Sitamarhi. 4.

The Child Development Program Officer, Bathnaha, District- Sitamarhi. 5.

The Mukhiya , Gram Panchayat Raj, Harnaiya Block Bathanaha, DistrictSitamarhi. 6.

Punam Kumari, Wife of Chandan Kumar, Resident of Village- Kamargama, P.O. Kishanpur, P.S. Bathnaha, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms Shashi Priya Pathak, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA II Mr Gopal Krishna, AC to GA II ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 01-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State.

Petitioner is aggrieved by selection of respondent No 6 as Angan Bari Sevika for Ward No 12 at Gram Panchayat Raj Harnaiya in the district of Sitamarhi.

Petitioner has raised her grievance claiming her selection before the District Programme Officer, Sitamarhi by an application which has been sent by post on 19.03.2019. Petitioner's counsel submits that fresh copy of the application

Patna High Court CWJC No.8792 of 2019(2) dt.01-08-2019 2/2 shall be filed within two weeks before the District Programme Officer to facilitate the consideration.

As petitioner's clam has to be considered by the District Programme Officer, who is the competent authority under the Guidelines, keeping the instant proceeding pending before this Court, will serve no useful purpose. Writ petition, therefore, stands disposed of. District Programme Officer (Establishment), Sitamarhi (respondent No 3) should dispose of the petitioner's application after hearing the necessary parties by reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U