Neeraj Kumar @ Neeraj Poddar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30095 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-456 Year-2024 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== Neeraj Kumar @ Neeraj Poddar S/o Pawan Poddar @ Pavan Paudar R/o Vill.- Daparkha, P.S.- Triveniganj, Distt.- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prafull Chandra Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Triveniganj P.S Case No. 456 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(6) of B.N.S and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, three persons assaulted the informant by firearm and snatched Rs. 25,000/- from the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that petitioner is not named in FIR and no TIP conducted during the investigation of this case. It is also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30095 of 2025(2) dt.15-05-2025 2/2 submitted that petitioner is in judicial custody since 02.01.2025.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. On perusal of the FIR and impugned order, it appears that petitioner is not named in FIR, his named transpired from the confessional statement of the co-accused and self confession of the petitioner. Further, no incriminating articles has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Investigation is already concluded, accordingly, chargesheet has been submitted and no TIP conducted during investigation of this case.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, 1st, Supaul in connection with Triveniganj P.S Case No. 456 of 2024.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Mayank/- U T