Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29265/2026bail granted

Pappu Yadav @ Pappu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-06Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29265 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-27 Year-2026 Thana- ARIYARI District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Pappu Yadav @ Pappu Kumar S/O Bharat Yadav Resident of villageMayamarpur, P.S.- Ariyari, District- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 06-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Ariyari P.S. Case No. 27 of 2026 lodged on 22.02.2026, for the offence punishable under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against the sole petitioner. It has been alleged by the informant that his bike was subject to theft one year ago on 17.03.2025 and after repeated search, his bike was not found. Thereafter, on 07.02.2026, when the informant went to his sasural, then one person was going with certain parts of the bike. Upon query and observing the said bike, it transpires to the informant that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29265 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 2/3 said parts of the bike is actually the parts of his bike. The person who was alleged to be in possession of the parts of the bike has disclosed the name of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that the informant has not lodged any complaint regarding theft of his bike one year ago and he has not made accused to the person from whose possession, the part of the bike has been recovered. Counsel submits that upon the disclosure of the said person, the petitioner has been made accused in this case unnecessarily. He submits that there is no material against the petitioner and his criminal antecedent is also clean. He submits that the petitioner is ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon him.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. In the present facts and circumstances of this case, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M.- II,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29265 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026 3/3 Sheikhpura, in connection with Ariyari P.S. Case No. 27 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 with further conditions:- (i) one of the bailors should be the family member of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;

(ii) the petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court on each and every scheduled date, and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without any plausible reason/explanation shall be resulted into cancellation of his bail bonds by the Trial Court itself;

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U T