← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./28738/2020bail granted

Sipan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2021-01-05Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28738 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2019 Thana- PASRAHA District- Khagaria ====================================================== SIPAN YADAV S/o Paras Yadav, Resident of Village-Basua, P.S.-Pasraha, District-Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bishweshwar Ram For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jai Narayan Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 05-01-2021 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Jai Narayan Thakur, the learned APP appearing for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Pasraha P.S. Case No. 111 of 2019, G.R. No. 2458 of 2019 for the offence punishable under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code and 27(i) of the Arms Act.

The allegation is regarding the accused persons having arrived at the house of the informant and having fired gun shot on the father of the informant, resulting in his death. The main allegation is against the co-accused persons namely Sugan Yadav and Rakesh Yadav of having fired gun shot on the father of the informant, whereafter they are stated to have come out of the hut, where the petitioner and one other accused are

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28738 of 2020(4) dt.05-01-2021 2/3 stated to have been standing and then they all had fired gun shots in the air and had fled away.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent, has been falsely implicated in the present case and is languishing in custody since 09.01.2020. It is further submitted that as far as the petitioner is concerned, admittedly there is no allegation of him having entered inside the hut and fired gun shots on the father of the informant, thus he can be granted the privilege of bail. Per contra, the learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail, made by the petitioner.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the materials available on records as also those available in the case diary, this Court finds that prima facie, miniscule evidence is available, as far as the petitioner is concerned, regarding his complicity in the alleged crime hence, I deem it fit and proper to direct for release of the petitioner on regular bail.

Accordingly, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28738 of 2020(4) dt.05-01-2021 3/3 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Khagaria in connection with Pasraha P.S. Case No. 111 of 2019, G.R. No. 2458 of 2019. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Tiwary/- U T