Rashmi Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8837 of 2013 =========================================================== Rashmi Kumari, w/o Randhi Prasad Roy, resident of village and Post- Darba, P.S.- Patory, District- Samastipur .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar, through the Secretary/Director I.C.D.S., Bihar, Patna
2. District Magistrate, Samastipur, District- Samastipur
3. District Programme Officer, Samastipur
4. C.D.P.O., Block Patory, District- Samastipur
5. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Darba, Block Patory, District- Samastipur .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, adv. For the Respondent No.5 : Mr. I.A. Giri, adv. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Ex-Mukhiya, respondent No.5.
2.
In this case, the petitioner has raised a grievance that on account of high handedness of the relatives of the Ex-Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj Darba, the petitioner could not be appointed as Anganbari Sevika. It has been claimed that though the petitioner was at serial No.1 in the merit list, but Ex-Mukhiya and its Family members was intending to appoint their own person.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8837 of 2013 dt.18-07-2016 2/2 3.
The petitioner has approached the different authorities but without any fruitful reason. Straightway the petitioner has approached this Court. Therefore, it will be appropriate for the petitioner to approach the competent authority as also to the forum of appeal has also been provided, has not been exhausted by him. 4.
In such a situation, this Court is disposing of this writ application with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent authority within a period of three weeks from today. If the petitioner files an application before the competent authority for redressal of his grievance, the competent authority will be obliged to consider her case and dispose of the same within a period of six months from the date of filing of such application.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 23/7/2016 Transmission Date