Irshad Shah @ Md. Irshad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29389 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2025 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Irshad Shah @ Md. Irshad S/O Md. Kalam R/O vill - Premdiha, P.S - Halsi, Dist- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Brajesh Sahay, Advocate Ms. Harshita, Advocate Mr. Amrita Kumari, Advocate Mr. Mandavi Kumari, Advocate Mr.Umesh Prasad, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 211 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 109(1), 74, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have assaulted the victim with a lathi causing simple injury.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2026 having one criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29389 of 2026(2) dt.11-05-2026 2/2
5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the simple nature of injury sustained by the informant, which is alleged to have been caused by the petitioner, this application is allowed.
7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Lakhisarai/ concerned Court in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 211 of 2025.
8. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T