← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39623/2018bail granted

Satish Choudhary @ Satish Kumar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2018-07-13Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39623 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2018 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Satish Choudhary @ Satish Kumar Choudhary son of Yogendra Choudhary, resident of Village- Kalisthan, Purani Bazar, P.O. and P.S. Tajpur, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Paswan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273/34 of the I.P.C. and Sections 30(a), 38(i)(ii) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The prosecution case, in short, is that 1666.800 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come on the disclosure of seizure list witness Trilokinath Upadhyay. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39623 of 2018(2) dt.13-07-2018 2/2 in this case. It is alleged that 1666.800 liters wine is recovered from co-accused Vivek Agrawal. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. District & Sessions Judge IIIrd-cum-Spl. Judge, Excise, Samastipur in connection with Tajpur P.S. case No.96 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T