Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29285/2025allowed

Surendra Ram @ Surendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-19Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29285 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2025 Thana- NARDIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Surendra Ram @ Surendra Prasad S/O Late Baleshwar Ram R/O Vill - Dhaniyawan, P.S.- Nardiganj, Dist.- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-05-2025 Heard Mr. Birendra Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohammed Arif, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 48 of 2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b) a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from requisition of this petitioner one loaded country made pistol was recovered. The learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that during seizure, the provision of Section 103 of BNSS has not been followed.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29285 of 2025(2) dt.19-05-2025 2/2 08.02.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases. One case is counter case of Nardiganj P.S. Case No.49 of 2025 and in another case he has been acquitted by the learned trial Court.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Nawada, in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 48 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Saurav/- U T