Ajit Kumar Madhukar @ Ajeet Kumar Maduhkar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42588 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2018 Thana- PALIGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Ajit Kumar Madhukar @ Ajeet Kumar Maduhkar Son of Ranjapit Yadav, resident of Dihpali, P.S. Paliganj, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Paliganj P.S. case no. 84 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 3/7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.
It is submitted that alleged articles have been recovered from the house of Fudan Yadav. Petitioner is a P.D.S. dealer. The petitioner has been made accused merely because he is father of aforesaid Fudan Yadav.
From the written report as well as seizure list it would appear that alleged articles have been recovered from the house of Fudan Yadav In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42588 of 2018(2) dt.17-07-2018 2/2 of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Paliganj P.S. case no. 84 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the SDJM Danapur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and
(3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T