Kishor Ravi @ Guddu Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32285 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-46 Year-2024 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Kishor Ravi @ Guddu Singh Son of Awadh Kishore Singh Resident of Village - Dalpat Bishunpur, P.S. - Dhaka, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad, Sr. Adv.
:
Mr. Kundan Rathore, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Suraj Kumar Tiwari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-10-2024 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 46 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 376AB of the IPC and Sections 4/6 of POCSO Act.
3. As per allegation, the six years old daughter (victim) of the informant who was playing outside the door. The petitioner allured the victim for giving some money, he brought her to his house and after that he closed doors from inside. The informant and her family members rush there and forcibly opened the door. The victim came out from the room and she was crying. Blood was found on her clothes. Blood was also oozing from her private part.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32285 of 2024(6) dt.07-10-2024 2/2
4. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is under custody since 08.02.2024 and as per injury report, no injury was found on the person of the victim.
5. Learned APP for the State, Mr. Shailendra Kumar assisted by the learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the FIR itself shows that the blood was oozing from the private part of the victim who is a girl of six years of age and the victim in her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C has fully corroborated the allegation. It has also been submitted by the learned counsels that in medical report, blood was found in her private part.
6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances as well as gravity of the allegation, I do not think it to be a fit case for bail, which is hereby rejected. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) priyanka/- U T