← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12546/2021dismissed

Swati Manohar v. The Union Of India

2022-08-17Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12546 of 2021 ====================================================== Swati Manohar Wife of Sri Manohar Lal Permanent Address- R/o Flat No227, Rosewood Apartment, Sector-13, Pocket- A, Dwarka, P.S.- Dwarka North, District- South West Delhi (New Delhi) Present Address R/o Assistant Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi Central University, Motihari, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Education, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.

2.

The Secretary, Department of Education, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. 3.

Mahatma Gandhi Central University, East Champaran, Bihar through the Vice Chancellor.

4.

The Vice Chancellor, Mahatma Gandhi Central University, East Champaran, Bihar.

5.

The Registrar, Mahatma Gandhi Central University, East Champaran, Bihar. 6.

The Competent Authority, Mahatma Gandhi Central University, East Champaran, Bihar.

7.

Officer on Special Duty (Admnistration), Mahatma Gandhi Central University, East Champaran, Bihar.

8.

Officer on Special Duty (Finance), Mahatma Gandhi Central University, East Champaran, Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar @ Alok Kr Shahi For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Dr. K.N. Singh (ASG) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 17-08-2022 Learned counsel for the respondents has filed counter affidavit.

Registry is directed to place the same on record. It is stated that the relief claimed by the petitioner has already been redressed. The petitioner has been warned to be careful in future and the entire salary for the suspension

Patna High Court CWJC No.12546 of 2021(3) dt.17-08-2022 2/2 period apart from subsistence allowance already paid earlier, has been directed to be released.

Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to get the aspect verified. However, this court finds that once the order has been passed of reinstatement and salary has also been released, no further purpose would be served in keeping the case pending. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) amit/- Item no.70 U