Ms Eklavya Stone And Mines Pvt Ltd, v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7850 of 2024 ====================================================== Ms Eklavya Stone And Mines Pvt Ltd, through its Director Nidhi Kumari, aged about 34 years , Female, Daughter of Amarnath Singh, Resident of A-58, Police Colony, Near Park, Gandhi Vihar, Phulwari, Anisabad, P.S.- Gardanibagh, District- Patna, having its Registered office at Village- Pathra English, P.O.- Orhanpur, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Inspector General, Registration, Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Inspector General, Registration, Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Accountant General (Audit), Bihar, Patna. 4.
The General Manager, Bihar State Mining Corporation Ltd., Bihar, Patna. 5.
The Authorized Officer, Bihar State Mining Corporation Ltd., Bihar, Patna. 6.
The Collector -cum- District Magistrate -cum- District Registrar, Nawada. 7.
The District Sub Registrar, District Registration Office, Nawada Collectorate, Nawada.
8.
The Treasury Officer, E- Treasury-cum-Joint Commissioner (Financial Administration), Sichai Bhawan, Patna.
9.
The In-charge Officer, District Legal Section, Nawada. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Sita Ram Yadav, GP-16 Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava, AC to GP-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-05-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State are present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance has already stands redressed and therefore no cause of action survives for pursuing in the present writ application. He therefore prays that the present writ application be disposed of in this light.
Patna High Court CWJC No.7850 of 2024(7) dt.06-05-2025 2/2
3. Learned counsel for the State also endorses the view of the petitioner.
4. In the light of the above, the present writ application is disposed of because the grievance of the petitioner already stands redressed.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Prakash Narayan U