Satyendra Yadav @ Satendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62396 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -370 Year- 2017 Thana -BELAGANJ District- GAYA ====================================================== Satyendra Yadav @ Satendra Yadav, son of Ramdeo Yadav, resident of village Gangti, P.S. Belaganj, Distt. Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Anusuiya Jaiswal, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 20-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Belaganj P.S. Case No. 370 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section 30(a)(c)(d) of Excise Act.

From the seizure list it appears that liquor has been recovered from Gangti Ahra. From the seizure list it appears that there is no recovery from conscious possession of this petitioner. From the written report it appears that local people have disclosed the name of this petitioner.

It is mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62396 of 2017 (2) dt.20-12-2017 2/2 weeks from today, in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 370 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Excise Judge, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T