← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39535/2021dismissed

Md. Irfan v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-01Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39535 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2019 Thana- PARIHAR District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== MD. IRFAN S/o Md. Sabir Resident of Village- Sutihara, P.S.- Parihart, Dist.- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mahendra Thakur, Adv.

For the informant :

Mr. Birendra Kumar, Adv.

For the State : Mr. A.M.P. Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner seeks bail in Parihar P.S. Case No. 167 of 2019 registered under Sections-341, 323, 324, 504, 506, 307, 354, 302, 109, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected taking into account that the petitioner was one of the assailants causing death of the deceased.

A report was called for from the trial court. It has been reported that the case has been committed to the court of sessions.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39535 of 2021(3) dt.01-12-2021 2/2 On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the nature of accusation, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

Learned trial court is directed to take all necessary steps to frame the charge and proceed with the trial and conclude the same at the earliest, preferably within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.

On behalf of the parties, It has been submitted that the charge has already been framed and two witnesses have already been examined on behalf of the prosecution. If the same is correct, the trial court shall proceed with the trial and conclude the same within the stipulated period of nine months. (Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T