Patna High CourtCWJC/10960/2015dismissed

Indrakishore Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-24Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10960 of 2015 ====================================================== Indrakishore Chaudhary S/o Late Kapileshwar Chaudhary, R/o Balwaghat, P.S. Piprahi, District - Sheohar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Branch Sachiwalaya, Patna

4. The Branch Manager, Jamavridhi Yojna, PACS Limited, Parsauni, Branch Patahi, Bairgania, District - Sitamarhi, Pin - Code 843313 .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shambhu Sharan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Shankar, A.C. to G.P.-6 For the State Bank of India : Mr. Kaushalendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 24-02-2016 Heard the parties.

Mr. Kaushalendra Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State Bank of India and Mr. Gyan Shankar A.C. to G.P. 6 for the respondent appear and submit that the foundation of the case lies on a letter of a person claiming to be a Branch Officer in the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms and placing reliance thereon, the petitioner claims that an amount of Rs. 2,47,470/- was transferred in his favour by the respondent no. 3 through the respondent no.4-Bank. While Mr. Shankar, learned counsel

Patna High Court CWJC No.10960 of 2015 (4) dt.24-02-2016 appearing for the State with reference to the statement made in Paragraph-10 of the counter affidavit submitted that the document itself is fake and no such person by the name of Sri Awadhesh Kumar Singh exists in the department, Mr. Kaushalendra Kumar Sinha submits that the identity of respondent no.4 itself is shrouded with cloud and the affidavit of the State has not been contested by the petitioner. This writ petition in the circumstances is dismissed. (Jyoti Saran, J) deepika/- U