Shashi Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8709 of 2019 ====================================================== Shashi Kumar Singh son of Sadanand Singh Resident of Village- Hastinapur, P.O.- Bhalua, P.S. Shambhu Ganj, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna. 2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, New Secretariat, Patna.
3.
The Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Magadh University through its Registrar, Bodh Gaya, Gaya. 5.
The Vice- Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya. 6.
The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya. 7.
Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Gaya. 8.
The Principal, Kishori Sinha Mahila College, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Yugal Kishore, Sr. Advocate Mr.Ugranath Mallik Mr. Virendra Prasad For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey (AAG-15) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 24-04-2019 The learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the present case is squarely covered by a judgment reported in 2018
(3) PLJR 1029 (Akhilanand Singh & ors. vs. The State of Bihar & ors.), hence the present writ petition can be disposed off with a direction to the University to absorb the services of the petitioner in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Akhilanand Singh & ors. (supra) as well as for payment of the consequential benefits in terms thereof.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8709 of 2019(2) dt.24-04-2019 2/2 Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that the respondent no. 6 shall examine the case of the petitioner and take a final decision in the matter and in case his case is found to be similar, then similar benefits would be given to the petitioner herein.
Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner shall file a representation before the respondent no. 6, enclosing a copy of the judgment passed in the case of Akhilanand Singh & ors. (supra), within a period of four weeks from today and the respondent no. 6 shall pass a reasoned and just order within a period of eight weeks thereafter.
The writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U