Meena Kumari v. The State Of Bihar.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12600 of 2021 ====================================================== Meena Kumari Daughter of Late Ramashish Prasad, Wife of Shri Kailash Mahto, Resident of Village/Mohalla - Anand Nagar, Mohanpur, Ward No. 09, Post office - Bariyarpur, Police Station- Sitamarhi, District - Sitamarhi. Retired while working as a Block Education Officer, Benipatti, Block - Benipatti, District - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary-cum-the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Patna. 4.

The Deputy Director, Primary Education, Education Department, Patna. 5.

The District Education Officer, Madhubani.

6.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Madhubani. 7.

The Block Education Officer, Benipatti, District - Madhubani. 8.

The District Treasury Officer, Madhubani.

9.

The District Accounts Officer, Madhubani.

10.

The Accountant General, Veerchand Patel Path, Bihar, Patna. 11.

The Pay and Accounts Officer, Pay and Accounts Officer, Mahalekhakar Bhavan, Birchand Patel Path, Bailey Road, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan AC to GP-20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 24-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that counter affidavit has been received and he seeks two weeks time. Counsel for the State categorically mentioned that in the counter affidavit it has been clearly stated in paragraph no.7

Patna High Court CWJC No.12600 of 2021(4) dt.24-01-2023 2/2 that admissible dues have been paid to the petitioner. In this background, this application is disposed of directing the petitioner that upon going through the counter affidavit, if he found anything not paid or some part which is still left found due, he may file representation in this regard within 6 weeks from the date of passing of this order and authority will decide the same within 10 weeks thereafter. With this direction, the writ application is hereby disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ritik/- U